Skip to main content
MTSS Platform

Data updated last night at 2:00 AM

District overview

How MTSS is working in all schools, under Rule Set v3. Use the filters to narrow by school, grade, class or teacher.

Suggested by the rules

The district rules place every student in a tier and flag where to look. The rules suggest. People decide.

  • 10,424

    student placements in Tier 2 or 3 by the rules

    See them
  • 4,571

    of them have no intervention plan

    See them
  • 2,612

    students due for review at the next meeting

    See them
  • 59

    classes with a class-wide concern

    See them
  • 6

    interventionists who may need support

    See them

Skills by content domain

Average percentile in each domain, and the share of students below the Tier 2 line. The domain with the most students below the line is marked. Percentiles are imported from the District Diagnostic.

Reading

Math

Subject

Reading and Math side by side

all schools. Each student has a tier in each subject. Select a subject to jump to its detail.

  • Reading

    23% 11% in Tier 2 or 3 · 14,762 students

  • Math

    24% 13% in Tier 2 or 3 · 14,764 students

Reading

Tier distribution

Reading students in all schools

  • Tier 19,733 students, 66%
  • Tier 23,362 students, 23%
  • Tier 31,667 students, 11%

Students monitored

14,762

With a Reading score this year.

23%

In Tier 2

3,362 students

11%

In Tier 3

1,667 students

56%

Intervention coverage

2,825 of 5,029 Tier 2 and 3 students have an active plan.

92%

Dosage delivered

Average share of scheduled sessions held, across 1438 plans.

2.5

Fidelity

2.5 / 3

Average “delivered as planned” rating after each session.

Tier share

66% of all schools Reading students are in Tier 1, 23% in Tier 2 and 11% in Tier 3.

Tier share: showing as a chart.

14,762students

Feeder patterns

Schools that send students to the same middle and high school, compared on Reading. Select a name to open its students.

Feeder patterns: showing as a chart.

Reading tier distribution by school

North Jackson Elementary has the most students in Tier 2 or 3 (49%); Bates Elementary has the fewest (16%).

  • Tier 1
  • Tier 2
  • Tier 3

Reading tier distribution by school: showing as a chart.

Showing the 12 schools with the largest share in Tier 2 or 3, of 35.

Needs attention

Flags from the district rules, for Reading.

Reading growth by school, Spring 2026 to Fall 2026

Cardozo Middle has the largest share meeting needed growth (45%).

  • Meeting needed growth
  • Meeting typical growth
  • Below typical growth

Reading growth by school, Spring 2026 to Fall 2026: showing as a chart.

Math

Tier distribution

Math students in all schools

  • Tier 19,369 students, 63%
  • Tier 23,522 students, 24%
  • Tier 31,873 students, 13%

Students monitored

14,764

With a Math score this year.

24%

In Tier 2

3,522 students

13%

In Tier 3

1,873 students

56%

Intervention coverage

3,028 of 5,395 Tier 2 and 3 students have an active plan.

92%

Dosage delivered

Average share of scheduled sessions held, across 1511 plans.

2.5

Fidelity

2.5 / 3

Average “delivered as planned” rating after each session.

Tier share

63% of all schools Math students are in Tier 1, 24% in Tier 2 and 13% in Tier 3.

Tier share: showing as a chart.

14,764students

Feeder patterns

Schools that send students to the same middle and high school, compared on Math. Select a name to open its students.

Feeder patterns: showing as a chart.

Math tier distribution by school

Forest Hill High has the most students in Tier 2 or 3 (49%); Boyd Elementary has the fewest (18%).

  • Tier 1
  • Tier 2
  • Tier 3

Math tier distribution by school: showing as a chart.

Showing the 12 schools with the largest share in Tier 2 or 3, of 35.

Needs attention

Flags from the district rules, for Math.

  • Lanier Jr./Sr. High: intervention coverage 47%.
  • Van Winkle Elementary: intervention coverage 45%.
  • Callaway High: intervention coverage 49%.
  • Shirley Elementary: intervention coverage 46%.
  • Forest Hill High: intervention coverage 45%.
  • Walton Elementary: intervention coverage 50%.
  • Jim Hill High: intervention coverage 39%.
  • McWillie Elementary: intervention coverage 47%.
  • Peeples Middle: intervention coverage 55%.
  • Murrah High: intervention coverage 49%.
  • John Hopkins Elementary: intervention coverage 48%.
  • Provine High: intervention coverage 44%.
  • North Jackson Elementary: 2 classes with a class-wide concern.
  • Kirksey Middle: 1 class with a class-wide concern.
  • Lanier Jr./Sr. High: 4 classes with a class-wide concern.
  • Van Winkle Elementary: 1 class with a class-wide concern.
  • Powell Middle: 1 class with a class-wide concern.
  • Callaway High: 1 class with a class-wide concern.
  • Cardozo Middle: 2 classes with a class-wide concern.
  • Forest Hill High: 6 classes with a class-wide concern.
  • Walton Elementary: 2 classes with a class-wide concern.
  • Jim Hill High: 2 classes with a class-wide concern.
  • McWillie Elementary: 1 class with a class-wide concern.
  • Peeples Middle: 1 class with a class-wide concern.
  • Murrah High: 4 classes with a class-wide concern.
  • John Hopkins Elementary: 3 classes with a class-wide concern.

Math growth by school, Spring 2026 to Fall 2026

Murrah High has the largest share meeting needed growth (45%).

  • Meeting needed growth
  • Meeting typical growth
  • Below typical growth

Math growth by school, Spring 2026 to Fall 2026: showing as a chart.